Re: CLUSTER on partitioned index

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
To: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, 李杰(慎追) <adger(dot)lj(at)alibaba-inc(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, 曾文旌(义从) <wenjing(dot)zwj(at)alibaba-inc(dot)com>, Zhihong Yu <zyu(at)yugabyte(dot)com>
Subject: Re: CLUSTER on partitioned index
Date: 2022-04-14 20:37:06
Message-ID: 202204142037.z6kcy2j66q3e@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Thanks for the patch -- I have pushed it now, with some wording changes
and renaming the role to regress_* to avoid buildfarm's ire.

Michaël in addition proposes an isolation test. I'm not sure; is it
worth the additional test run time? It doesn't seem a critical issue.
But if anybody feels like contributing one, step right ahead.

--
Álvaro Herrera PostgreSQL Developer — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2022-04-14 21:33:15 Re: Intermittent buildfarm failures on wrasse
Previous Message Zheng Li 2022-04-14 20:31:15 Re: Support logical replication of DDLs