Re: support for MERGE

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
Cc: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Ranier Vilela <ranier(dot)vf(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, Japin Li <japinli(at)hotmail(dot)com>, Zhihong Yu <zyu(at)yugabyte(dot)com>, simon(dot)riggs(at)enterprisedb(dot)co, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Daniel Westermann <dwe(at)dbi-services(dot)com>, Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: support for MERGE
Date: 2022-04-02 16:28:33
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On 2022-04-02 17:02:01 +0200, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> There's no bug here and this is actually intentional: if the map is
> NULL, this function should not be called.

This made me, again, wonder if we should add a pg_nonnull attibute to c.h. The
compiler can probably figure it out in this case, but there's plenty cases it
can't, because the function definition is in a different translation unit. And
IMO it helps humans too.



In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2022-04-02 17:11:47 Re: CLUSTER on partitioned index
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2022-04-02 15:19:26 Re: merge documentation fix