| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Commitfest Update |
| Date: | 2022-03-31 12:53:07 |
| Message-ID: | 202203311253.2xdtmafnmbqp@alvherre.pgsql |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2022-Mar-31, Matthias van de Meent wrote:
> I know that this has happened earlier; where someone re-opened their
> old RwF-patches in closed commitfests; after which those patches got
> lost in the traffic because they are not open in the current (or
> upcoming) commitfests.
Hmm, it's quite possible that an explicit action "move to next CF" is
required. I don't really know what actions are allowed, though.
--
Álvaro Herrera PostgreSQL Developer — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2022-03-31 13:05:52 | Re: Logical insert/update/delete WAL records for custom table AMs |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2022-03-31 12:39:19 | Re: CLUSTER on partitioned index |