Re: generic plans and "initial" pruning

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
To: Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: generic plans and "initial" pruning
Date: 2022-03-31 09:56:09
Message-ID: 202203310956.pz6sazhzzfcq@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I'm looking at 0001 here with intention to commit later. I see that
there is some resistance to 0004, but I think a final verdict on that
one doesn't materially affect 0001.

--
Álvaro Herrera PostgreSQL Developer — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"El destino baraja y nosotros jugamos" (A. Schopenhauer)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrei Zubkov 2022-03-31 10:06:10 Re: [PATCH] Tracking statements entry timestamp in pg_stat_statements
Previous Message John Naylor 2022-03-31 09:51:05 Re: do only critical work during single-user vacuum?