Re: cpluspluscheck vs ICU

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>
Subject: Re: cpluspluscheck vs ICU
Date: 2022-03-23 15:56:17
Message-ID: 20220323155617.qjssw2hzwkhsft4o@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2022-03-23 08:19:38 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> On 3/22/22 22:23, Andres Freund wrote:
> > On 2022-03-22 17:20:24 -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> >> I was about to propose adding headerscheck / cpluspluscheck to the CI file so
> >> that cfbot can catch future issues.
> > The attached patch does so, with ICU disabled to avoid the problems discussed
> > in the thread. Example run:
> > https://cirrus-ci.com/task/6326161696358400?logs=headers_headerscheck#L0
> >
> > Unless somebody sees a reason not to, I'm planning to commit this soon.
> >
>
> That only helps when running the CI/cfbot setup. Fixing it for other
> (manual or buildfarm) users would be nice. Luckily crake isn't building
> with ICU.

Oh, I agree we need to fix it properly. I just don't yet know how to - see the
list of alternatives upthread. Seems no reason to hold up preventing further
problems via CI / cfbot though.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2022-03-23 16:03:35 Re: pgsql: Unbreak the build.
Previous Message Tom Lane 2022-03-23 15:55:37 Re: pgsql: Unbreak the build.