| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, Joshua Brindle <joshua(dot)brindle(at)crunchydata(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Joe Conway <joe(at)crunchydata(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
| Subject: | Re: New Object Access Type hooks |
| Date: | 2022-03-22 22:20:11 |
| Message-ID: | 20220322222011.3lkygr6julmbhewi@alap3.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 2022-03-22 13:47:27 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> OK, I have pushed that.
Seems like it might actually be good to test that object access hooks work
well in a parallel worker. How about going the other way and explicitly setting
force_parallel_mode = disabled for parts of the test and to enabled for
others?
- Andres
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Rowley | 2022-03-22 22:24:13 | Re: Window Function "Run Conditions" |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2022-03-22 22:20:09 | Re: SQL/JSON: functions |