Re: New Object Access Type hooks

From: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Joshua Brindle <joshua(dot)brindle(at)crunchydata(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Joe Conway <joe(at)crunchydata(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Subject: Re: New Object Access Type hooks
Date: 2022-03-22 15:14:44
Message-ID: 20220322151444.pagugrb7rjmlee2z@jrouhaud
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 10:41:05AM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
> Pushed with slight adjustments - the LOAD was unnecessary as was the
> setting of client_min_messages - the latter would have made buildfarm
> animals unhappy.

For the record this just failed on my buildfarm animal:
https://brekka.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_stage_log.pl?nm=lapwing&dt=2022-03-22%2014%3A40%3A10&stg=misc-check.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2022-03-22 15:23:16 Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints
Previous Message David Rowley 2022-03-22 15:08:44 Re: Use generation context to speed up tuplesorts