Re: [PATCH] Proof of concept for GUC improvements

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: David Christensen <david(at)pgguru(dot)net>
Cc: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Cary Huang <cary(dot)huang(at)highgo(dot)ca>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Proof of concept for GUC improvements
Date: 2022-03-22 00:37:00
Message-ID: 20220322003700.2zyq3chjtb7ogji5@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2022-01-12 12:57:02 -0600, David Christensen wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > According to the cfbot, the patch doesn't apply anymore and needs a
> > rebase: http://cfbot.cputube.org/patch_36_3290.log
>
> V4 rebased attached.

Doesn't apply anymore, again: http://cfbot.cputube.org/patch_37_3290.log

My impression is that there's not a lot of enthusiasm for the concept? If
that's true we maybe ought to mark the CF entry as rejected?

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2022-03-22 00:40:47 Re: Proposal: allow database-specific role memberships
Previous Message Andres Freund 2022-03-22 00:34:31 Re: [WIP] Allow pg_upgrade to copy segments of the same relfilenode in parallel