Re: pg_stat_bgwriter.buffers_backend is pretty meaningless (and more?)

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Lukas Fittl <lukas(at)fittl(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: pg_stat_bgwriter.buffers_backend is pretty meaningless (and more?)
Date: 2022-03-22 00:15:05
Message-ID: 20220322001505.fgysjvihvagduete@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2022-02-19 11:06:18 -0500, Melanie Plageman wrote:
> v21 rebased with compile errors fixed is attached.

This currently doesn't apply (mea culpa likely): http://cfbot.cputube.org/patch_37_3272.log

Could you rebase? Marked as waiting-on-author for now.

- Andres

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2022-03-22 00:15:59 Re: Mingw task for Cirrus CI
Previous Message Andres Freund 2022-03-22 00:13:35 Re: Add connection active, idle time to pg_stat_activity