| From: | Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Zhihong Yu <zyu(at)yugabyte(dot)com>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Pavel Trukhanov <pavel(dot)trukhanov(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_stat_statements and "IN" conditions |
| Date: | 2022-03-14 15:33:46 |
| Message-ID: | 20220314153346.6chynq26mcypxaco@ddolgov.remote.csb |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 11:23:17AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>
> I do find it odd that the proposed patch doesn't cause the *entire*
> list to be skipped over. That seems like extra complexity and confusion
> to no benefit.
That's a bit surprising for me, I haven't even thought that folks could
think this is an odd behaviour. As I've mentioned above, the original
idea was to give some clues about what was inside the collapsed array,
but if everyone finds it unnecessary I can of course change it.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2022-03-14 15:38:23 | Re: pg_stat_statements and "IN" conditions |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2022-03-14 15:33:25 | Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints |