Re: ltree_gist indexes broken after pg_upgrade from 12 to 13

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Nikita Glukhov <n(dot)gluhov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: ltree_gist indexes broken after pg_upgrade from 12 to 13
Date: 2022-03-10 17:24:19
Message-ID: 20220310172419.ik6gt5fylhvinl74@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2022-03-10 10:43:06 -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> On 3/6/22 17:33, Andres Freund wrote:
> > One thing that's likely worth doing as part of the cross version upgrade test,
> > even if it wouldn't even help in this case, is to run amcheck post
> > upgrade. Just dumping data isn't going to touch indices at all.
> >
> > A sequence of
> > pg_upgrade; amcheck; upgrade all extensions; amcheck;
> > would make sense.

> See
> <https://github.com/PGBuildFarm/client-code/commit/191df23bd25eb5546b0989d71ae92747151f9f39>
> This will be in the next release

Great, thanks for doing that!

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David G. Johnston 2022-03-10 17:26:08 Re: role self-revocation
Previous Message Tom Lane 2022-03-10 17:11:59 Re: pg_stat_statements and "IN" conditions