Re: WIP: WAL prefetch (another approach)

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Ashutosh Sharma <ashu(dot)coek88(at)gmail(dot)com>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jakub Wartak <Jakub(dot)Wartak(at)tomtom(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: WIP: WAL prefetch (another approach)
Date: 2022-03-08 21:17:16
Message-ID: 20220308211716.u32tjb54u4f47fzi@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2022-03-08 18:15:43 +1300, Thomas Munro wrote:
> I'm now starting to think about committing this soon.

+1

Are you thinking of committing both patches at once, or with a bit of
distance?

I think something in the regression tests ought to enable
recovery_prefetch. 027_stream_regress or 001_stream_rep seem like the obvious
candidates?

- Andres

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2022-03-08 21:42:08 Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints
Previous Message David Steele 2022-03-08 21:09:50 Re: Postgres restart in the middle of exclusive backup and the presence of backup_label file