| From: | Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com |
| Cc: | bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com, nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com, sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net, bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com, rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com, michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Add checkpoint and redo LSN to LogCheckpointEnd log message |
| Date: | 2022-02-25 07:47:01 |
| Message-ID: | 20220225.164701.2129889180141558946.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
At Fri, 25 Feb 2022 16:06:31 +0900 (JST), Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote in
> At Fri, 25 Feb 2022 15:31:12 +0900 (JST), Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote in
> > While making patches for v12, I see a test failure of pg_rewind for
> > uncertain reason. I'm investigating that but I post this for
> > discussion.
>
> Hmm. Too stupid. Somehow I overly removed the latchet condition for
> minRecoveryPoint. So the same patch worked for v12.
So, this is the patches for pg12-10. 11 can share the same patch with
12. 10 has differences in two points.
10 has ControlFile->prevCheckPoint.
The DETAILS of the "recovery restart point at" message is not
capitalized. But I suppose it is so close to EOL so that we don't
want to "fix" it risking existing usecases.
regards.
--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kyotaro Horiguchi | 2022-02-25 07:52:30 | Re: Add checkpoint and redo LSN to LogCheckpointEnd log message |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2022-02-25 07:45:00 | Re: [Proposal] Global temporary tables |