Re: convert libpq uri-regress tests to tap test

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: convert libpq uri-regress tests to tap test
Date: 2022-02-23 21:46:34
Message-ID: 202202232146.xkrt7kmtbwde@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2022-Feb-23, Andres Freund wrote:

> Separately: I don't really understand why we do the whole if USE_PGXS dance in
> src/test/modules?

Yeah, it seems a bit silly. I'm not opposed to making these makefiles
unconditionally do the PGXS thing -- or the non-PGXS thing, if that
makes it easier to build multiple binaries.

--
Álvaro Herrera Valdivia, Chile — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"La grandeza es una experiencia transitoria. Nunca es consistente.
Depende en gran parte de la imaginación humana creadora de mitos"
(Irulan)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2022-02-23 21:57:02 Re: convert libpq uri-regress tests to tap test
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2022-02-23 21:44:44 Re: convert libpq uri-regress tests to tap test