Re: Design of pg_stat_subscription_workers vs pgstats

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Design of pg_stat_subscription_workers vs pgstats
Date: 2022-02-21 16:17:15
Message-ID: 20220221161715.647j6s65b4nn7owp@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2022-02-21 14:49:01 +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 1:18 PM Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> > > * stats_reset (Time at which these statistics were last reset)
> > >
> > > The view name could be pg_stat_subscription_lrep,
> > > pg_stat_logical_replication, or something on those lines.
> >
> > pg_stat_subscription_stats :)

> Having *stat* two times in the name sounds slightly odd to me but let
> us see what others think. One more option could be
> pg_stat_subscription_replication.

It was a joke, making light of our bad naming in pg_stat_*, not a serious
suggestion...

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David G. Johnston 2022-02-21 16:19:11 Re: Design of pg_stat_subscription_workers vs pgstats
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2022-02-21 16:11:14 Re: Reducing power consumption on idle servers