Re: MultiXact\SLRU buffers configuration

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, Gilles Darold <gilles(at)darold(dot)net>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>, Anastasia Lubennikova <a(dot)lubennikova(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: MultiXact\SLRU buffers configuration
Date: 2022-02-19 21:42:23
Message-ID: 20220219214223.w4bmhiozeimcqhzb@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2022-02-20 10:38:53 +1300, Thomas Munro wrote:
> Back to this patch: assuming we can settle on a good-enough-for-now
> replacement algorithm, do we want to add this set of 7 GUCs? Does
> anyone else want to weigh in on that?

I'm -0.2 on it, given that we have a better path forward.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2022-02-19 21:50:59 Re: Refactor CheckpointWriteDelay()
Previous Message Thomas Munro 2022-02-19 21:38:53 Re: MultiXact\SLRU buffers configuration