Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Yura Sokolov <y(dot)sokolov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum
Date: 2022-02-13 03:39:54
Message-ID: 20220213033954.ubq7hzsxzufr5efv@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2022-02-13 12:36:13 +0900, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> Actually, I'm working on simplifying and improving radix tree
> implementation for PG16 dev cycle. From the discussion so far I think
> it's better to have a data structure that can be used for
> general-purpose and is also good for storing TID, not very specific to
> store TID. So I think radix tree would be a potent candidate. I have
> done the insertion and search implementation.

Awesome!

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2022-02-13 03:43:37 Re: Adding CI to our tree
Previous Message Andres Freund 2022-02-13 03:37:30 using file cloning in create database / initdb