Re: archive modules

From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Subject: Re: archive modules
Date: 2022-02-03 21:55:37
Message-ID: 20220203215537.GA1123901@nathanxps13
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Feb 03, 2022 at 04:45:52PM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 3, 2022 at 4:25 PM Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> 024_archive_recovery.pl seems to do something similar. Patch attached.
>
> Committed. I think this is mostly an issue for pg_regress tests, as
> opposed to 024_archive_recovery.pl, which is a TAP test. Maybe I'm
> wrong about that, but it looks to me like most TAP tests choose what
> they want explicitly, while pg_regress tests tend to inherit the
> value.

Thanks!

--
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2022-02-03 21:58:00 Re: do only critical work during single-user vacuum?
Previous Message Andres Freund 2022-02-03 21:50:48 Re: do only critical work during single-user vacuum?