Re: archive modules

From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Subject: Re: archive modules
Date: 2022-02-03 21:25:39
Message-ID: 20220203212539.GA1082940@nathanxps13
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Feb 03, 2022 at 04:15:30PM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 3, 2022 at 4:11 PM Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 03, 2022 at 04:04:33PM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
>> > So apparently we need to either skip this test when wal_level=minimal,
>> > or force a higher wal_level to be used for this particular test. Not
>> > sure what the existing precedents are, if any.
>> The only precedent I've found so far is test_decoding, which sets wal_level
>> to "logical." Perhaps we can just set it to "replica" in
>> basic_archive.conf.
> Yeah, that seems to make sense. seems to do something similar. Patch attached.

Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services:

Attachment Content-Type Size
fix-basic-archive-test.patch text/x-diff 361 bytes

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2022-02-03 21:45:52 Re: archive modules
Previous Message John Naylor 2022-02-03 21:18:27 Re: do only critical work during single-user vacuum?