Re: Extensible Rmgr for Table AMs

From: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Extensible Rmgr for Table AMs
Date: 2022-02-01 12:45:50
Message-ID: 20220201124550.gnhpw7iytc4da5tq@jrouhaud
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Feb 01, 2022 at 12:39:38PM +0800, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
>
> Other than that the patch looks good to me, as you said we just need a decision
> on whether custom rmgrs are wanted or not.

One last thing, did you do some benchmark with a couple custom rmgr to see how
much the O(n) access is showing up in profiles?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bharath Rupireddy 2022-02-01 13:03:24 Re: Add checkpoint and redo LSN to LogCheckpointEnd log message
Previous Message Antonin Houska 2022-02-01 12:15:29 Re: Doc: CREATE_REPLICATION_SLOT command requires the plugin name