Re: A test for replay of regression tests

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Anastasia Lubennikova <lubennikovaav(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: A test for replay of regression tests
Date: 2022-01-27 22:07:55
Message-ID: 20220127220755.zprmb4mxlbhy4ljw@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2022-01-27 14:03:51 -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
> In my msys install a normal regress run takes 57s, 027_stream_regress.pl takes
> 194s.
>
> That means every single psql started by 027_stream_regress.pl's pg_regress
> takes 2s. Which of course adds up...

Oh, forgot: After adding --host to the pg_regress invocation
027_stream_regress.pl takes 75s (from 194s before).

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2022-01-27 22:11:28 Re: Creation of an empty table is not fsync'd at checkpoint
Previous Message Andres Freund 2022-01-27 22:03:51 Re: A test for replay of regression tests