| From: | Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Cc: | "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, "wangsh(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <wangsh(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Greg Sabino Mullane <htamfids(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: make MaxBackends available in _PG_init |
| Date: | 2022-01-27 18:18:15 |
| Message-ID: | 20220127181815.GA551692@nathanxps13 |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 09:56:04AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Hmm. I have been looking at this patch, and the lack of centralized
> solution that could be used for other GUCs worries me like Fujii-san,
> even if this would prevent an incorrect use of MaxBackends in contexts
> where it should not be used because it is not initialized yet. I
> don't think it is a good idea in the long-term to apply this as-is.
Alright. I think the comment adjustments still apply, so I split those out
to a new patch.
--
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com/
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| v7-0001-Adjust-comments-about-registering-background-work.patch | text/x-diff | 2.6 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2022-01-27 18:28:38 | Re: Creation of an empty table is not fsync'd at checkpoint |
| Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2022-01-27 17:55:45 | Creation of an empty table is not fsync'd at checkpoint |