Re: make MaxBackends available in _PG_init

From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, "wangsh(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <wangsh(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Greg Sabino Mullane <htamfids(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: make MaxBackends available in _PG_init
Date: 2022-01-27 18:18:15
Message-ID: 20220127181815.GA551692@nathanxps13
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 09:56:04AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Hmm. I have been looking at this patch, and the lack of centralized
> solution that could be used for other GUCs worries me like Fujii-san,
> even if this would prevent an incorrect use of MaxBackends in contexts
> where it should not be used because it is not initialized yet. I
> don't think it is a good idea in the long-term to apply this as-is.

Alright. I think the comment adjustments still apply, so I split those out
to a new patch.

Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services:

Attachment Content-Type Size
v7-0001-Adjust-comments-about-registering-background-work.patch text/x-diff 2.6 KB

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2022-01-27 18:28:38 Re: Creation of an empty table is not fsync'd at checkpoint
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2022-01-27 17:55:45 Creation of an empty table is not fsync'd at checkpoint