Re: fairywren is generating bogus BASE_BACKUP commands

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: fairywren is generating bogus BASE_BACKUP commands
Date: 2022-01-24 21:39:41
Message-ID: 20220124213941.ddsywxml7mjocwsr@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2022-01-24 14:01:37 -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> Well if we can get Andres' suggestion to work all this might go away,
> which would keep everyone happy, especially me.

I successfully tried it for a few tests. But I see tests hanging a lot
independent of the way I run the tests, presumably due to the issues discussed
in [1]. So we need to do something about that.

I don't have the cycles to finish changing over to that way of running tests -
do you have some time to work on it, if I clean up the bit I have?

- Andres

[1] https://postgr.es/m/CA%2BhUKG%2BOeoETZQ%3DQw5Ub5h3tmwQhBmDA%3DnuNO3KG%3DzWfUypFAw%40mail.gmail.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2022-01-24 21:41:50 Re: CREATEROLE and role ownership hierarchies
Previous Message Robert Haas 2022-01-24 21:31:08 Re: [BUG]Update Toast data failure in logical replication