| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: fairywren is generating bogus BASE_BACKUP commands |
| Date: | 2022-01-21 23:28:04 |
| Message-ID: | 20220121232804.nj7av7ydcvtd2nop@alap3.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 2022-01-21 17:26:32 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> I think the syntax has been accepted since pg_basebackup was added in 2011,
> and Andres added it to this test case earlier this week (with -cfast in the
> subject line of the commit message).
The reason I used -cfast instead of -c fast or --checkpoint=fast is that the
way perltidy formats leads to very wide lines already, and making them even
longer seemed unattractive...
Given the -cfast syntax successfully passed tests on at least AIX, freebsd,
linux, macos, netbsd, openbsd, windows msvc, windows msys, I'm not too worried
about portability either.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | James Coleman | 2022-01-21 23:29:04 | Re: Document atthasmissing default optimization avoids verification table scan |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2022-01-21 23:21:00 | Re: fairywren is generating bogus BASE_BACKUP commands |