Re: BUFFERS enabled by default in EXPLAIN (ANALYZE)

From: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>
Cc: Nikolay Samokhvalov <samokhvalov(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUFFERS enabled by default in EXPLAIN (ANALYZE)
Date: 2022-01-18 06:53:09
Message-ID: 20220118065309.owxcnfpldwo6dbpz@jrouhaud
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 06:58:20PM -0600, Justin Pryzby wrote:
>
> The attached patch series now looks like this (some minor patches are not
> included in this list):

This version of the patchset doesn't apply anymore:

http://cfbot.cputube.org/patch_36_3409.log
=== Applying patches on top of PostgreSQL commit ID 4483b2cf29bfe8091b721756928ccbe31c5c8e14 ===
=== applying patch ./0003-Make-explain-default-to-BUFFERS-TRUE.patch
patching file doc/src/sgml/config.sgml
Hunk #1 FAILED at 7615.
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file doc/src/sgml/config.sgml.rej

By the way, could you add versionning to the patchsets you send, e.g. git
format-patch -vXXX. It would make it easier to know which version are used or
discussed.

I'm switching the CF entry to Waiting on Author.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Julien Rouhaud 2022-01-18 06:57:50 Re: missing indexes in indexlist with partitioned tables
Previous Message Shruthi Gowda 2022-01-18 06:48:42 Re: preserving db/ts/relfilenode OIDs across pg_upgrade (was Re: storing an explicit nonce)