Re: a misbehavior of partition row movement (?)

From: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Ibrar Ahmed <ibrar(dot)ahmad(at)gmail(dot)com>, Arne Roland <A(dot)Roland(at)index(dot)de>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Rahila Syed <rahilasyed90(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: a misbehavior of partition row movement (?)
Date: 2022-01-18 04:16:23
Message-ID: 20220118041623.ffxy2gphluossyk5@jrouhaud
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 08:40:54PM +0900, Amit Langote wrote:
>
> Okay, I created versions of the patch series for branches 13 and 14
> (.txt files). The one for HEAD is also re-attached.

FYI The patch failed today on FreeBSD, while it was previously quite stable on
all platforms (https://cirrus-ci.com/build/4551468081479680), with this error:

https://api.cirrus-ci.com/v1/artifact/task/6360787076775936/regress_diffs/src/test/recovery/tmp_check/regression.diffs
diff -U3 /tmp/cirrus-ci-build/src/test/recovery/../regress/expected/reloptions.out /tmp/cirrus-ci-build/src/test/recovery/tmp_check/results/reloptions.out
--- /tmp/cirrus-ci-build/src/test/recovery/../regress/expected/reloptions.out 2022-01-18 00:12:52.533086000 +0000
+++ /tmp/cirrus-ci-build/src/test/recovery/tmp_check/results/reloptions.out 2022-01-18 00:28:00.000524000 +0000
@@ -133,7 +133,7 @@
SELECT pg_relation_size('reloptions_test') = 0;
?column?
----------
- t
+ f
(1 row)

I'm not sure why this test failed as it doesn't seem like something impacted by
the patch, but I may have missed something as I only had a quick look at the
patch and discussion.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Julien Rouhaud 2022-01-18 04:25:15 Re: TAP test to cover "EndOfLogTLI != replayTLI" case
Previous Message Robert Haas 2022-01-18 04:13:43 Re: Removing more vacuumlazy.c special cases, relfrozenxid optimizations