Re: Null commitTS bug

From: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz
Cc: tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, kingsboa(at)amazon(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Null commitTS bug
Date: 2022-01-18 04:48:11
Message-ID: 20220118.134811.2027892091043257338.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

At Tue, 18 Jan 2022 10:43:55 +0900, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote in
> On Sun, Jan 16, 2022 at 11:01:25PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Isn't that a very bad way to write "i = j + 1"?
> >
> > I agree with Horiguchi-san that
> > for (i = 0, headxid = xid;;)
>
> Okay. Horiguchi-san, would you like to write a patch?

Yes, I will.

regards.

--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Nancarrow 2022-01-18 04:52:49 Re: row filtering for logical replication
Previous Message Masahiko Sawada 2022-01-18 04:43:07 Re: Skipping logical replication transactions on subscriber side