Re: a misbehavior of partition row movement (?)

From: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Ibrar Ahmed <ibrar(dot)ahmad(at)gmail(dot)com>, Arne Roland <A(dot)Roland(at)index(dot)de>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Rahila Syed <rahilasyed90(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: a misbehavior of partition row movement (?)
Date: 2022-01-13 03:19:27
Message-ID: 20220113031927.vggu5dzdg4nvohbo@jrouhaud
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On Tue, Jan 11, 2022 at 05:08:59PM +0900, Amit Langote wrote:
> I think I've managed to apply f4566345cf40b into v13 and v14. Patches attached.

FTR this doesn't play well with the cfbot unfortunately as it tries to apply
both patches, and obviously on the wrong branches anyway.

It means that the previous-0002-now-0001 patch that Álvaro previously sent
is not tested anymore, and IIUC it's not pushed yet so it's not ideal.

There's now an official documentation on how to send patches that should be
ignored by the cfbot [1], so sending backpatch versions with a .txt extension
could be useful. Just in case I'm attaching the pending patch to this mail to
make the cfbot happy again.


Attachment Content-Type Size
v12-0001-Enforce-foreign-key-correctly-during-cross-parti.patch text/plain 57.9 KB

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fujii Masao 2022-01-13 03:38:12 Re: [PATCH]Add tab completion for foreigh table
Previous Message Julien Rouhaud 2022-01-13 03:10:05 Re: ExecRTCheckPerms() and many prunable partitions