Re: a misbehavior of partition row movement (?)

From: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Ibrar Ahmed <ibrar(dot)ahmad(at)gmail(dot)com>, Arne Roland <A(dot)Roland(at)index(dot)de>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Rahila Syed <rahilasyed90(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: a misbehavior of partition row movement (?)
Date: 2022-01-13 03:19:27
Message-ID: 20220113031927.vggu5dzdg4nvohbo@jrouhaud
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On Tue, Jan 11, 2022 at 05:08:59PM +0900, Amit Langote wrote:
>
> I think I've managed to apply f4566345cf40b into v13 and v14. Patches attached.
>

FTR this doesn't play well with the cfbot unfortunately as it tries to apply
both patches, and obviously on the wrong branches anyway.

It means that the previous-0002-now-0001 patch that Álvaro previously sent
(https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/202201052227.bc4yvvy6lqpb%40alvherre.pgsql)
is not tested anymore, and IIUC it's not pushed yet so it's not ideal.

There's now an official documentation on how to send patches that should be
ignored by the cfbot [1], so sending backpatch versions with a .txt extension
could be useful. Just in case I'm attaching the pending patch to this mail to
make the cfbot happy again.

[1] https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Cfbot#Which_attachments_are_considered_to_be_patches.3F

Attachment Content-Type Size
v12-0001-Enforce-foreign-key-correctly-during-cross-parti.patch text/plain 57.9 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fujii Masao 2022-01-13 03:38:12 Re: [PATCH]Add tab completion for foreigh table
Previous Message Julien Rouhaud 2022-01-13 03:10:05 Re: ExecRTCheckPerms() and many prunable partitions