Re: Remove inconsistent quotes from date_part error

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Nikhil Benesch <nikhil(dot)benesch(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Remove inconsistent quotes from date_part error
Date: 2022-01-03 18:35:33
Message-ID: 202201031835.zxrlklgg5z66@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2022-Jan-03, Tom Lane wrote:

> Attached v3 restores that distinction, and makes some other small
> tweaks. (I found that there were actually a couple of spots in
> date.c that got it backwards, so admittedly this is a fine point
> that not everybody is on board with. But let's make it consistent
> now.)

LGTM.

> @@ -2202,9 +2204,9 @@ time_part_common(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS, bool retnumeric)
> case DTK_ISOYEAR:
> default:
> ereport(ERROR,
> - (errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE),
> - errmsg("\"time\" units \"%s\" not recognized",
> - lowunits)));
> + (errcode(ERRCODE_FEATURE_NOT_SUPPORTED),
> + errmsg("unit \"%s\" not supported for type %s",
> + lowunits, format_type_be(TIMEOID))));

I agree that these changes are an improvement.

--
Álvaro Herrera PostgreSQL Developer — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chapman Flack 2022-01-03 18:36:52 TYPCATEGORY_{NETWORK,USER} [was Dubious usage of TYPCATEGORY_STRING]
Previous Message John Naylor 2022-01-03 18:34:03 Re: Introducing PgVA aka PostgresVectorAcceleration using SIMD vector instructions starting with hex_encode