Re: pg_stat_bgwriter.buffers_backend is pretty meaningless (and more?)

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
To: Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Lukas Fittl <lukas(at)fittl(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: pg_stat_bgwriter.buffers_backend is pretty meaningless (and more?)
Date: 2021-12-16 21:24:44
Message-ID: 202112162124.m2sgkdxnuuty@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2021-Dec-15, Melanie Plageman wrote:

> I noticed after changing the docs on the "bgwriter" target for
> pg_stat_reset_shared to say "checkpointer", that it still said "bgwriter" in
> src/backend/po/ko.po
> src/backend/po/it.po
> ...
> I presume these are automatically updated with some incantation, but I wasn't
> sure what it was nor could I find documentation on this.

Yes, feel free to ignore those files completely. They are updated using
an external workflow that you don't need to concern yourself with.

--
Álvaro Herrera Valdivia, Chile — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"World domination is proceeding according to plan" (Andrew Morton)

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Imseih (AWS), Sami 2021-12-16 21:37:11 Re: Add index scan progress to pg_stat_progress_vacuum
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2021-12-16 21:23:17 Re: Buildfarm support for older versions