From: | Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Unifying VACUUM VERBOSE and log_autovacuum_min_duration output |
Date: | 2021-11-26 21:57:12 |
Message-ID: | 20211126215712.GF17618@telsasoft.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Nov 26, 2021 at 12:37:32PM -0800, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> My preferred approach to this is simple: redefine VACUUM VERBOSE to
> not show incremental output, which seems rather unhelpful anyway.
> I don't think that we need to keep the getrusage() stuff at all, though.
+1
> * VACUUM VERBOSE doesn't provide much of the most useful
> instrumentation that we have available in log_autovacuum_min_duration,
> and yet produces output that is ludicrously, unmanageably verbose --
> lots of pg_rusage_show() information for each and every step, which
> just isn't useful.
Not only not useful/unhelpful, but confusing.
It's what I complained about here.
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/20191220171132(dot)GB30414(at)telsasoft(dot)com
I see that lazy_scan_heap() still has a shadow variable buf...
--
Justin
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2021-11-26 22:56:14 | Re: Unifying VACUUM VERBOSE and log_autovacuum_min_duration output |
Previous Message | Justin Pryzby | 2021-11-26 21:16:36 | Re: pg_stat_bgwriter.buffers_backend is pretty meaningless (and more?) |