Re: Some RELKIND macro refactoring

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Some RELKIND macro refactoring
Date: 2021-11-23 15:19:13
Message-ID: 202111231519.kf27gjzikeko@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2021-Nov-22, Peter Eisentraut wrote:

> Maybe
> else
> {
> Assert(RELKIND_HAS_STORAGE(rel->rd_rel->relkind);
> RelationCreateStorage(rel->rd_node, relpersistence);
> }
> create_storage is set earlier based on RELKIND_HAS_STORAGE(), so this would
> be consistent.

Hmm, right ... but I think we can make this a little simpler. How about
the attached?

Álvaro Herrera Valdivia, Chile —

Attachment Content-Type Size
create-storage.patch text/x-diff 2.1 KB

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Drouvot, Bertrand 2021-11-23 15:22:19 Re: Patch to avoid orphaned dependencies
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2021-11-23 15:09:00 Re: Some RELKIND macro refactoring