| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Predefined role pg_maintenance for VACUUM, ANALYZE, CHECKPOINT. |
| Date: | 2021-11-08 17:45:20 |
| Message-ID: | 202111081745.2xfjjcflasr6@alvherre.pgsql |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2021-Nov-08, Stephen Frost wrote:
> * Alvaro Herrera (alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org) wrote:
> > That said, if the list is short, then additional predefined roles seem
> > preferrable to having a ton of infrastructure code that might be much
> > more clutter than what seems a short list of additional predefined roles.
>
> None of this strikes me as a 'ton of infrastructure code' and so I'm not
> quite sure I'm following the argument being made here.
I was referring specifically to Andres' idea of having additional DDL
commands handled as special GRANTable privileges,
https://postgr.es/m/20211104224636.5qg6cfyjkw52rh4d@alap3.anarazel.de
--
Álvaro Herrera Valdivia, Chile — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"Hay quien adquiere la mala costumbre de ser infeliz" (M. A. Evans)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2021-11-08 17:47:23 | Re: Predefined role pg_maintenance for VACUUM, ANALYZE, CHECKPOINT. |
| Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2021-11-08 17:39:33 | Re: Predefined role pg_maintenance for VACUUM, ANALYZE, CHECKPOINT. |