From: | Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Semab Tariq <semab(dot)tariq(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Sandeep Thakkar <sandeep(dot)thakkar(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, CM Team <cm(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> |
Subject: | Re: CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY does not index prepared xact's data |
Date: | 2021-11-06 23:08:46 |
Message-ID: | 20211106230846.GA790288@rfd.leadboat.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On Fri, Nov 05, 2021 at 04:22:36AM -0700, Noah Misch wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 05, 2021 at 03:21:15PM +0500, Semab Tariq wrote:
> > Breakpoint 1, 0x40000000003fcb50:0 in equalTupleDescs (
> > tupdesc1=0x40010006f968, tupdesc2=0x87ffffffffffac50)
>
> The addresses there are weird. tupdesc1 is neither a stack address nor a heap
> address; it may be in a program text section. tupdesc2 is a stack address.
> In the earlier stack trace from
> https://postgr.es/m/CANFyU94Xa8a5+4sZ7PxOiDLq+yN89g6y-9nNk-eLEvX6YUXbXA@mail.gmail.com
> both tupdesc1 and tupdesc2 were heap addresses.
>
> > /home/pgbfarm/buildroot-gharial-HEAD/postgresql/src/test/subscription/tmp_check/t_080_step_equalTupleDescs_main_data/commands-gdb:8: Error in sourced command file:
> > Error accessing memory address 0x40010006f968: Bad address.
>
> Thanks. Please try the attached test version, which avoids exiting too early
> like the last version did.
If you haven't run that yet, please use this version instead. It collects
more data. The log will probably be too big to be proper for the mailing
list, so please compress it.
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
step-to-crash-v0.3.patch | text/plain | 3.6 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2021-11-07 00:06:55 | Re: BUG #17268: Possible corruption in toast index after reindex index concurrently |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2021-11-06 01:59:58 | Re: BUG #17257: (auto)vacuum hangs within lazy_scan_prune() |