Re: should we enable log_checkpoints out of the box?

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
To: Jan Wieck <jan(at)wi3ck(dot)info>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Michael Banck <michael(dot)banck(at)credativ(dot)de>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: should we enable log_checkpoints out of the box?
Date: 2021-11-05 14:27:10
Message-ID: 202111051427.ngkdozok7wc2@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2021-Nov-03, Jan Wieck wrote:

> On 11/3/21 09:09, Robert Haas wrote:
>
> > For better or for worse, the distinction between ERROR, FATAL, and
> > PANIC is entirely based on what we do after printing the message,
> > and NOT on how serious the message is.
>
> THAT is a real problem with our error handling and logging system.

Agreed.

--
Álvaro Herrera 39°49'30"S 73°17'W — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"No es bueno caminar con un hombre muerto"

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Banck 2021-11-05 14:29:37 Re: should we enable log_checkpoints out of the box?
Previous Message David G. Johnston 2021-11-05 14:22:29 Re: [PATCH] rename column if exists