| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: 2021-09 Commitfest |
| Date: | 2021-10-02 15:20:09 |
| Message-ID: | 202110021520.qza6ifgbguyd@alvherre.pgsql |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2021-Oct-02, Tom Lane wrote:
> Yeah. I have been thinking of looking through the oldest CF entries
> and proposing that we just reject any that look permanently stalled.
> It doesn't do much good to leave things in the list when there's
> no apparent interest in pushing them to conclusion. But I've not
> done the legwork yet, and I'm a little worried about the push-back
> that will inevitably result.
I was just going to say the same thing yesterday, and reference [1]
when I did it once in 2019. I think it was a useful cleanup exercise.
In hindsight, some of these patches were resubmitted later, and those
are either still ongoing or are already committed.
[1] https://postgr.es/m/20190930182818.GA25331@alvherre.pgsql
(I did have the luxury of a local copy of the commitfest database, which
is perhaps a service we could offer to CFMs to make their lives easier.)
--
Álvaro Herrera 39°49'30"S 73°17'W — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"Digital and video cameras have this adjustment and film cameras don't for the
same reason dogs and cats lick themselves: because they can." (Ken Rockwell)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2021-10-02 15:24:52 | Re: 2021-09 Commitfest |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2021-10-02 15:18:48 | Re: 2021-09 Commitfest |