From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Sean Chittenden <sean(at)chittenden(dot)org>, btober(at)seaworthysys(dot)com |
Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] Temporary tables and miscellaneous schemas |
Date: | 2003-12-21 05:25:10 |
Message-ID: | 20211.1071984310@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Also, how do we know something is a temp schema? Just the prefix
> pg_temp_*?
Yeah. Remember that all schemas named pg_XXX are reserved for system
use. For the moment, testing for pg_temp_XXX is a bulletproof test,
and we can certainly adapt psql's test if we ever add schemas that might
conflict.
Looking at the present output of \dn, I wonder whether we should not
suppress the pg_toast schema as well. That could be done (at the
moment) by bouncing all schemas 'pg_t*' ...
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Claudio Natoli | 2003-12-21 05:25:20 | Current Win32 port status |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-12-21 05:25:05 | 7.4.1 release notes updated |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-12-21 05:26:47 | Re: [GENERAL] Temporary tables and miscellaneous schemas |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-12-21 05:21:35 | Re: [GENERAL] Temporary tables and miscellaneous schemas |