Re: Numeric x^y for negative x

From: Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>
To: Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Yugo NAGATA <nagata(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Numeric x^y for negative x
Date: 2021-09-30 17:25:07
Message-ID: 20210930172507.GA10820@ahch-to
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 07:29:13PM +0100, Dean Rasheed wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Sept 2021 at 17:51, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> wrote:
> >
> > I came here just to opine that there should be a comment about there not
> > being a clamp to the maximum scale. For example, log_var says "Set the
> > scales .. so that they each have more digits ..." which seems clear
> > enough; I think the new comment is a bit on the short side.
> >
>
> OK, that's a fair point. Updated version attached.
>

Hi Dean,

Are you planning to commit this soon?

--
Jaime Casanova
Director de Servicios Profesionales
SystemGuards - Consultores de PostgreSQL

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message James Coleman 2021-09-30 17:37:44 Re: Document spaces in .pgpass need to be escaped
Previous Message Tom Lane 2021-09-30 17:16:22 Re: [BUG] failed assertion in EnsurePortalSnapshotExists()