| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, "andres(at)anarazel(dot)de" <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, "masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com" <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, "mengjuan(dot)cmj(at)alibaba-inc(dot)com" <mengjuan(dot)cmj(at)alibaba-inc(dot)com>, "Jakub(dot)Wartak(at)tomtom(dot)com" <Jakub(dot)Wartak(at)tomtom(dot)com>, Ryo Matsumura <matsumura(dot)ryo(at)fujitsu(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: prevent immature WAL streaming |
| Date: | 2021-09-23 16:39:55 |
| Message-ID: | 202109231639.6yuarurrvjps@alvherre.pgsql |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
This took some time because backpatching the tests was more work than I
anticipated -- function name changes, operators that don't exist,
definition of the WAL segment size in pg_settings. I had to remove the
second test in branches 13 and earlier due to lack of LSN+bytes
operator. Fortunately, the first test (which is not as clean) still
works all the way back.
However, I notice now that the pg_rewind tests reproducibly fail in
branch 14 for reasons I haven't yet understood. It's strange that no
other branch fails, even when run quite a few times.
--
Álvaro Herrera 39°49'30"S 73°17'W — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"Siempre hay que alimentar a los dioses, aunque la tierra esté seca" (Orual)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2021-09-23 16:57:41 | Re: Estimating HugePages Requirements? |
| Previous Message | John Naylor | 2021-09-23 16:16:47 | Re: mark the timestamptz variant of date_bin() as stable |