Re: Eval expression R/O once time (src/backend/executor/execExpr.c)

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Ranier Vilela <ranier(dot)vf(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Eval expression R/O once time (src/backend/executor/execExpr.c)
Date: 2021-09-21 23:00:55
Message-ID: 20210921230055.sbdfdli6myiimxvm@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2021-09-21 18:21:24 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> > On 2021-09-21 15:09:11 -0300, Ranier Vilela wrote:
> >> Currently when determining where CoerceToDomainValue can be read,
> >> it evaluates every step in a loop.
> >> But, I think that the expression is immutable and should be solved only
> >> once.
>
> > What is immutable here?
>
> I think Ranier has a point here. The clear intent of this bit:
>
> /*
> * If first time through, determine where CoerceToDomainValue
> * nodes should read from.
> */
> if (domainval == NULL)
> {
>
> is that we only need to emit the EEOP_MAKE_READONLY once when there are
> multiple CHECK constraints. But because domainval has the wrong lifespan,
> that test is constant-true, and we'll do it over each time to little
> purpose.

Oh, I clearly re-skimmed the code too quickly. Sorry for that!

> (AFAICS anyway)
>
> I'm unexcited by the proposed move of the save_innermost_domainval/null
> variables, though. It adds no correctness and it forces an additional
> level of indentation of a good deal of code, as the patch fails to show.

Yea.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ranier Vilela 2021-09-21 23:12:33 Re: Eval expression R/O once time (src/backend/executor/execExpr.c)
Previous Message Andres Freund 2021-09-21 22:58:05 Re: windows build slow due to windows.h includes