|From:||Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>|
|To:||Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>|
|Subject:||Re: Gather performance analysis|
|Views:||Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email|
On 2021-09-08 11:45:16 +0530, Dilip Kumar wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 8, 2021 at 3:08 AM Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> > Looking at this profile made me wonder if this was a build without
> > optimizations. The pg_atomic_read_u64()/pg_atomic_read_u64_impl() calls
> > should
> > be inlined. And while perf can reconstruct inlined functions when using
> > --call-graph=dwarf, they show up like "pg_atomic_read_u64 (inlined)" for
> > me.
> Yeah, for profiling generally I build without optimizations so that I can
> see all the functions in the stack, so yeah profile results are without
> optimizations build but the performance results are with optimizations
I'm afraid that makes the profiles just about meaningless :(.
> Is this with or without patch, I mean can we see a comparison that patch
> improved anything in your environment?
It was without any patches. I'll try the patch in a bit.
|Next Message||Michael Paquier||2021-09-08 06:34:51||Re: Rewriting the test of pg_upgrade as a TAP test - take three - remastered set|
|Previous Message||Dilip Kumar||2021-09-08 06:28:17||Re: [BUG]Update Toast data failure in logical replication|