From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com, nagata(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp, ranier(dot)vf(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: corruption of WAL page header is never reported |
Date: | 2021-09-05 18:11:13 |
Message-ID: | 202109051811.p4wkqm6ogvn5@alvherre.pgsql |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2021-Sep-03, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
> diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
> index 24165ab03e..b621ad6b0f 100644
> --- a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
> +++ b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
> @@ -12496,9 +12496,21 @@ retry:
> *
> * Validating the page header is cheap enough that doing it twice
> * shouldn't be a big deal from a performance point of view.
> + *
> + * Don't call XLogReaderValidatePageHeader here while not in standby mode
> + * so that this function won't return with a valid errmsg_buf.
> */
> - if (!XLogReaderValidatePageHeader(xlogreader, targetPagePtr, readBuf))
> + if (StandbyMode &&
> + !XLogReaderValidatePageHeader(xlogreader, targetPagePtr, readBuf))
OK, but I don't understand why we have a comment that says (referring to
non-standby mode) "doing it twice shouldn't be a big deal", followed by
"Don't do it twice while not in standby mode" -- that seems quite
contradictory. I think the new comment should overwrite the previous
one, something like this:
- * Validating the page header is cheap enough that doing it twice
- * shouldn't be a big deal from a performance point of view.
+ *
+ * We do this in standby mode only,
+ * so that this function won't return with a valid errmsg_buf.
*/
- if (!XLogReaderValidatePageHeader(xlogreader, targetPagePtr, readBuf))
+ if (StandbyMode &&
+ !XLogReaderValidatePageHeader(xlogreader, targetPagePtr, readBuf))
--
Álvaro Herrera Valdivia, Chile — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2021-09-05 18:57:33 | Re: Patch: shouldn't timezone(text, timestamp[tz]) be STABLE? |
Previous Message | Bossart, Nathan | 2021-09-05 17:57:11 | Re: pg_dump handling of ALTER DEFAULT PRIVILEGES IN SCHEMA |