Re: Mark all GUC variable as PGDLLIMPORT

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Mark all GUC variable as PGDLLIMPORT
Date: 2021-08-23 15:40:20
Message-ID: 202108231540.llqacduza3nx@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2021-Aug-23, Robert Haas wrote:

> It's also a bit unfair to say, well we have APIs for accessing GUC
> values. It's true that we do. But if the GUC variable is, say, a
> Boolean, you do not want your extension to call some function that
> does a bunch of shenanigans and returns a string so that you can then
> turn around and parse the string to recover the Boolean value. Even
> moreso if the value is an integer or a comma-separated list. You want
> to access the value as the system represents it internally, not
> duplicate the parsing logic in a way that is inefficient and
> bug-prone.

In that case, why not improve the API with functions that return the
values in some native datatype? For scalars with native C types (int,
floats, Boolean etc) this is easy enough; I bet it'll solve 99% of the
problems or more.

--
Álvaro Herrera 39°49'30"S 73°17'W — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2021-08-23 15:43:07 Regexp: observable bug from careless usage of zaptreesubs
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2021-08-23 15:26:53 Re: Queries that should be canceled will get stuck on secure_write function