Re: EXEC_BACKEND vs bgworkers without BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: EXEC_BACKEND vs bgworkers without BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS
Date: 2021-08-13 12:53:42
Message-ID: 20210813125342.3ki6d4m2cfwe7542@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2021-08-05 19:56:49 -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> Done in the attached patch. I don't think we need to add more to the docs than
> the flag being required?

Pushed that patch now. If we want further additions to the docs we can
do so separately.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2021-08-13 13:02:57 Re: CI/windows docker vs "am a service" autodetection on windows
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2021-08-13 12:50:17 Re: SI messages sent when excuting ROLLBACK PREPARED command