Re: pg_upgrade does not upgrade pg_stat_statements properly

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
Cc: Dave Cramer <davecramer(at)gmail(dot)com>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade does not upgrade pg_stat_statements properly
Date: 2021-07-29 19:06:45
Message-ID: 20210729190645.GS9600@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 01:43:09PM -0400, Álvaro Herrera wrote:
> On 2021-Jul-29, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > + If the old cluster used extensions, whether from
> > + <filename>contrib</filename> or some other source, it used
> > + shared object files (or DLLs) to implement these extensions, e.g.,
> > + <filename>pgcrypto.so</filename>. Now, shared object files matching
> > + the new server binary must be installed in the new cluster, usually
> > + via operating system commands. Do not load the schema definitions,
> > + e.g., <command>CREATE EXTENSION pgcrypto</command>, because these
> > + will be copied from the old cluster. (Extensions should be upgraded
> > + later using <literal>ALTER EXTENSION ... UPGRADE</literal>.)
>
> I propose this:
>
> <para>
> If the old cluster used shared-object files (or DLLs) for extensions
> or other loadable modules, install recompiled versions of those files
> onto the new cluster.
> Do not install the extension themselves (i.e., do not run
> <command>CREATE EXTENSION</command>), because extension definitions
> will be carried forward from the old cluster.
> </para>
>
> <para>
> Extensions can be upgraded after pg_upgrade completes using
> <command>ALTER EXTENSION ... UPGRADE</command>, on a per-database
> basis.
> </para>
>
> I suggest " ... for extensions or other loadable modules" because
> loadable modules aren't necessarily for extensions. Also, it's
> perfectly possible to have extension that don't have a loadable module.

Yes, good point.

> I suggest "extension definitions ... carried forward" instead of
> "extensions ... copied" (your proposed text) to avoid the idea that
> files are copied; use it instead of "schema definitions ... upgraded"
> (the current docs) to avoid the idea that they are actually upgraded;
> also, "schema definition" seems a misleading term to use here.

I used the term "duplicated".

> I suggest "can be upgraded" rather than "should be upgraded" because
> we're not making a recommendation, merely stating the fact that it is
> possible to do so.

Agreed. Most extensions don't have updates between major versions.

> I suggest using the imperative mood, to be consistent with the
> surrounding text. (Applies to the first para; the second para is
> informative.)

OK.

> I haven't seen it mentioned in the thread, but I think the final phrase
> of this <step> should be a separate step,
>
> <step>
> <title>Copy custom full-text search files</title>
> <para>
> Copy any custom full text search file (dictionary, synonym, thesaurus,
> stop word list) to the new server.
> </para>
> </step>
>
> While this is closely related to extensions, it's completely different.

Agreed. See attached patch.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com

If only the physical world exists, free will is an illusion.

Attachment Content-Type Size
pg_upgrade.diff text/x-diff 2.2 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2021-07-29 19:08:04 Re: pg_upgrade does not upgrade pg_stat_statements properly
Previous Message Yura Sokolov 2021-07-29 18:55:30 Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum