|From:||Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>|
|To:||Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>|
|Subject:||Re: [HACKERS] Preserving param location|
|Views:||Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email|
On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 02:02:18PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Hm. I guess this point (i.e. that the Param substitution should result
> in the identical plan tree as writing a literal constant would have)
> has some force. I still feel like your application is pretty shaky,
> but I don't really have any ideas about feasible ways to make it better.
I totally agree that it's quite shaky, but I also don't have a better idea on
how to improve it. In the meantime it already saved my former colleagues and I
(and I'm assuming other people) many hours of boring and tedious work.
> Will push the patch.
Thanks a lot!
|Next Message||Greg Nancarrow||2021-07-15 02:34:47||Re: Parallel scan with SubTransGetTopmostTransaction assert coredump|
|Previous Message||Michael Paquier||2021-07-15 02:21:43||Re: Remove redundant Assert(PgArchPID == 0); in PostmasterStateMachine|