| From: | Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Preserving param location |
| Date: | 2021-07-15 02:28:41 |
| Message-ID: | 20210715022841.zljv4e3xmvieyas2@nol |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 02:02:18PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> Hm. I guess this point (i.e. that the Param substitution should result
> in the identical plan tree as writing a literal constant would have)
> has some force. I still feel like your application is pretty shaky,
> but I don't really have any ideas about feasible ways to make it better.
I totally agree that it's quite shaky, but I also don't have a better idea on
how to improve it. In the meantime it already saved my former colleagues and I
(and I'm assuming other people) many hours of boring and tedious work.
> Will push the patch.
Thanks a lot!
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Greg Nancarrow | 2021-07-15 02:34:47 | Re: Parallel scan with SubTransGetTopmostTransaction assert coredump |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2021-07-15 02:21:43 | Re: Remove redundant Assert(PgArchPID == 0); in PostmasterStateMachine |