Re: [PATCH] Don't block HOT update by BRIN index

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
To: Josef Šimánek <josef(dot)simanek(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Don't block HOT update by BRIN index
Date: 2021-07-12 21:02:09
Message-ID: 202107122102.lj3c3dmzyzv5@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2021-Jul-12, Josef Šimánek wrote:

> > 2) Do we actually need to calculate and store hotblockingattrs
> > separately in RelationGetIndexAttrBitmap? It seems to me it's either
> > NULL (with amhotblocking=false) or equal to indexattrs. So why not to
> > just get rid of hotblockingattr and rd_hotblockingattr, and do something
> > like
> >
> > case INDEX_ATTR_BITMAP_HOT_BLOCKING:
> > return (amhotblocking) ? bms_copy(rel->rd_hotblockingattr) : NULL;
> >
> > I haven't tried, so maybe I'm missing something?
>
> relation->rd_indexattr is currently not used (at least I have not
> found anything) for anything, except looking if other values are
> already loaded.

Oh, that's interesting. What this means is that INDEX_ATTR_BITMAP_ALL
is no longer used; its uses must have all been replaced by something
else. It seems the only one that currently exists is for HOT in
heap_update, which this patch replaces with the new one. In a quick
search, no external code depends on it, so I'd be inclined to just
remove it ...

I think a boolean is much simpler. Consider a table with 1600 columns :-)

--
Álvaro Herrera PostgreSQL Developer — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"Puedes vivir sólo una vez, pero si lo haces bien, una vez es suficiente"

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2021-07-12 21:07:46 Re: [CLOBBER_CACHE]Server crashed with segfault 11 while executing clusterdb
Previous Message Tomas Vondra 2021-07-12 21:00:05 Re: [PATCH] Don't block HOT update by BRIN index