Re: Improving isolationtester's data output

On 2021-Jun-16, Tom Lane wrote:

> Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> writes:
> > I'm +1 for back-patching this class of change. I've wasted time adapting a
> > back-patch's test case to account for non-back-patched test infrastructure
> > changes. Every back-patch of test infrastructure has been a strict win from
> > my perspective.
>
> Hearing few objections, I'll plan on back-patching. I'm thinking that the
> best thing to do is apply these changes after beta2 wraps, but before we
> branch v14.

Great.

> BTW, as long as we're thinking of back-patching nontrivial specfile
> changes, I have another modest proposal. What do people think of
> removing the requirement for step/session names to be double-quoted,
> and instead letting them work like SQL identifiers?

Yes *please*.

--
Álvaro Herrera Valdivia, Chile
"[PostgreSQL] is a great group; in my opinion it is THE best open source
development communities in existence anywhere." (Lamar Owen)